Binsey Poplars, felled 1879
Gerard Manley Hopkins, My
aspens dear, whose airy cages quelled, Quelled or quenched in
leaves the leaping sun, All felled, felled, are all felled;
Of a fresh and following folded rank
Not spared, not one
That dandled a sandalled
Shadow that swam or sank On meadow & river & wind-wandering
weed-winding bank.
O if we but knew what we do
When we delve or hew — Hack and rack the
growing green!
Since country is so tender To touch, her
being só slender, That, like this sleek and
seeing ball But a prick will make no eye at
all, Where we, even where we mean
To mend her we end her,
When we hew or delve: After-comers cannot guess the beauty been.
Ten or twelve, only ten or twelve Strokes of
havoc unselve
The sweet especial scene, Rural scene, a
rural scene, Sweet especial rural scene.
We have met Gerard Manley Hopkins—poet and Jesuit
priest—a couple of times in this series. In his poem “God’s Grandeur,”
which we read back in April, we saw the strong ecological bent of
Hopkins’ poetry, which comes through in this poem as well. “Binsey
Poplars” is a short lyric, an elegy for a grove of aspen trees.
In the first part of the poem, Hopkins evokes the distinctive beauty of
the aspen tree, a type of poplar tree with fluttering leaves (which
appear with some frequency in English poetry!). Hopkins describes them
as “airy cages” that “quelled” or “quenched” the “leaping sun,”
beautifully evoking the way the sun shines through the trees. The Latin
name of these trees, populus tremula, arises from the distinctive
movement of the aspen’s leaves, and Hopkins evokes that playful movement
in the poem, describing how the trees “dandled a sandalled shadow.”
Even as he evokes their beauty, we sense the poet’s shock and
sadness. His “aspens dear” are “felled, felled, are all felled”: the
repetition of the word suggests the blows of the axe which cut them
down. Hopkins laments, “if we but knew what we do / When we delve or
hew.” Nature, he says, is “tender,” and her “being” is “slender” –
nature has the delicacy of an eye, and is as easily harmed or destroyed.
Why does Hopkins mourn the loss of these trees so much? Aren’t
there still plenty of aspens in England? In a journal entry written
about six years before “Binsey Poplars,” Hopkins wrote: “The ashtree
growing in the corner of the garden was felled. It was lopped first: I
heard the sound and looking out and seeing it maimed there came at that
moment a great pang and I wished to die and not to see the inscapes of
the world destroyed any more.” That word “inscape” is one of
Hopkins’ coinages. It could be defined as the distinctive inner nature
or shape of a thing – its uniqueness. That’s why he laments the Binsey
poplars—because even though there are many trees left, there’s nothing
quite like those particular trees – “after-comers cannot guess the
beauty been.” Just ten or twelve strokes of the axe and the trees are
gone. Worse than gone, they are “unselved,” another Hopkins coinage
which points to the destruction of their distinctive identity.
The poem ends with a series of repetitive phrases—“the sweet especial
scene / Rural scene, a rural scene, / Sweet especial rural scene.” That
repetition has a musical quality, almost like a song fading away. The
words are simple, but they highlight, once again, the reality that
something unique, something “especial,” has vanished in the destruction
of this row of aspen trees. I chose this poem at this time
because Hopkins so beautifully captures the real sadness we experience
when we witness the destruction of the natural world. A few weeks ago,
the row of elm trees along Marion Street, planted about the time of the
Cathedral’s dedication, was cut down. The trees had to be removed
because of Dutch elm disease, but knowing that did not make it much
easier to see them taken away. On a much larger scale, we have all
experienced a sense of loss at the destruction caused by the wildfires
across the west coast—millions of acres destroyed; trees and animals
gone; countless “inscapes,” as Hopkins would call them, lost to us.
Hopkins looked at the world with an artist’s keen awareness of the
beauty around him. In his encyclical Laudato Si, Pope Francis says that
this faculty of seeing the beautiful in nature is not tangential to the
ecological movement – it is key to protecting the earth and its
creatures. Pope Francis writes: “By learning to see and appreciate
beauty, we learn to reject self-interested pragmatism. If someone has
not learned to stop and admire something beautiful, we should not be
surprised if he or she treats everything as an object to be used and
abused without scruple. If we want to bring about deep change,” he says,
we all need to learn to see the world with a poet’s eyes.
|