The 30th Sunday of Ordinary Time
October 26, 2014
Last Sunday we had the Sadducees trying to trap Jesus with their rather
disingenuous question about paying taxes to Caesar; today we’ve got the
Pharisees putting Jesus to the test with their question about which of the
commandments is the greatest. In both cases, Jesus shows himself to be more
than their match.
You’ll pardon me, I hope, if I tell a favorite
story (one I’ve shared with you before). It’s a true story that took place
years ago when I was attending a week-long seminar on Canon Law at the
University of San Francisco (you probably don’t need me to tell you what a
stimulating week that was!). One afternoon I was walking across the campus
and got talking with a young woman who asked me why I was on campus.
When I told her I was attending a workshop on Church Law, I figured the
conversation would end there. But it didn’t – quite. She wanted
to know a little about Church law. Did the Church have many of them,
she asked? I told her that there were quite a few but not nearly as many as
there used to be. A recent revision, I told her, had trimmed the total
number by more than 600 – we’d gone from 2400 laws to fewer than 1800.
I said that with a certain ring of satisfaction in my voice because it
sounded like progress to me. Not to my young friend, however. She
stopped dead in her tracks, looked me in the eye, and asked, "How come Jesus
only had two?!"
Now, I might have been able to give her a fairly
cogent answer if I had had the time and she the patience. But I preferred
simply to say "touché!" To be honest, I was delighted by her question.
It told me that she knew some Scripture and that she knew the heart of
Jesus' teaching. Not everyone does. And sometimes the religious
"professionals" – I think, for instance, of some of the harsher voices that
spoke during the recent Roman Synod – the professionals can get lost in a
forest of rules and regulations. Pope Francis suggested rather pointedly, I
thought, that they were closing themselves off within the letter of the law
and refusing to allow themselves to be surprised by the God of surprises. I
like that.
The religious professionals of Jesus' day were
inclined to do the same. They had a field day with some 613 individual
precepts that made up the Torah, the Law. Rabbis loved to debate the
relative importance of each precept, and there was more than one school of
thought. In fact, to know how a particular rabbi summarized the Law was to
know what school he belonged to.
In today's passage from Matthew’s gospel, when
Jesus the Rabbi was approached by some lawyers and asked his opinion on this
matter he allied himself with a particular school, the one which taught that
the whole Law could be summarized by just two scriptural passages: one from
the Book of Deuteronomy, the other from the Book of Leviticus. A word
about each of those.
The first, from Deuteronomy, contained words that
were on the lips of a devout Jew every day and many times a day (a little
like the Sign of the Cross, the Lord’s Prayer, or the Hail Mary is on ours):
"Hear, O Israel, the Lord is our God, the Lord alone! Therefore you
shall love the Lord, your God, with all your heart, with all your soul, and
with all your mind." That, Jesus told the lawyer, was the first
commandment. And then he cited the Book of Leviticus, "You shall love
your neighbor as yourself.” That, he said, was the second commandment
and (and this is very important) – he told him that it was like the first.
Scholars tell us that what was unique about Jesus'
answer to the Lawyer was not his citing of the two commandments from
Deuteronomy and Leviticus. Other Rabbis did that. What was
unique was the way Jesus joined -- you might say merged -- those two
commandments, giving them equal footing. Neither could stand alone, he said:
you really couldn't have the one without the other. And that was not
only new, it was radical. Jesus was saying you don’t love God if you don’t
love your neighbor.
I called this "radical". It is. We may be so
used to the idea that it seems rather commonplace to us. But radical
it is. For this reason: it puts God and human beings together in the
same breath, the same sentence. Jesus is saying that God and human
beings made in God’s image and likeness, are so one, so intertwined and
interconnected that, even though their difference be greater by far than
night is from day, nonetheless they cannot be separated.
The implications are enormous. Religion is not only
vertical, it is horizontal. Religion for us is about Mass and the
sacraments, for sure, but it is also about the way we treat one another.
It’s about love, acceptance, patience and forgiveness within our families,
and for everyone in our families without exception; and for us in this
parish, it’s about the way we welcome the homeless, the hurting, and the
helpless, and the hopeless. Religion is not one or the other, it’s both.
Religion means seeking and finding our identity in the other -- in God who
is the Totally Other, and in our sisters and brothers who are created in
God's image and likeness.
I conclude with a little story from the Sufi
mystical tradition of the East. One day a holy monk sat in the
marketplace and watched the crippled, the beggars, and the beaten go by.
Seeing them, the holy monk went down into deep prayer and cried, "Great God,
how is it that a loving creator can see such things and yet do nothing about
them?" And out of the long silence God said, "I did do something about
them. I made you!"
Father Michael G. Ryan